GEN Z WON’T OWN HOMES. NOW THEY CAN’T EVEN AFFORD TO RENT.
Australia told Gen Z that renting was the price they had to pay for being locked out of homeownership. Now rents are surging, wages are falling behind and young Australians are being priced out of the last stable housing option they had left. Are we creating the country’s first generation without a secure place to live?
First, they told Gen Z to forget about buying a home.
Stop buying takeaway. Cancel the subscriptions. Work harder. Move further away. Lower your expectations.
Then renting became the answer.
You might never own the roof over your head, but at least you would have somewhere stable to live.
Now even that is disappearing.
In Anglicare Australia’s 2025 survey of 51,238 rental listings, not one property was affordable for someone receiving Youth Allowance.
Not 10 properties.
Not one.
The full-time minimum wage did not offer much protection either. Just 352 rentals, or 0.7% of everything surveyed, were considered affordable.
This is not simply a generation struggling to buy property.
It is a generation being locked out at both ends.
Too poor to buy. Increasingly too poor to rent. Forced to stay with parents for longer, live in overcrowded homes, move further away from employment or compete for increasingly expensive rooms in sharehouses.
And for those without family support, there may be nowhere left to go.
Homeownership disappeared first
Australians aged 25 to 29 once had a reasonable chance of owning a home.
In 1971, the homeownership rate for this age group was 50%.
By 2021, it had fallen to 36%.
Among Australians aged 30 to 34, ownership fell from 64% to 50% over the same period.
That decline did not happen because young Australians suddenly stopped wanting homes. It happened because the relationship between work and property broke down.
According to the National Housing Supply and Affordability Council, Australian dwelling prices increased 63% between December 2015 and June 2025.
Wages increased just 27%.
Property prices grew more than twice as fast as wages.
You can work harder. You can get promoted. You can save a larger percentage of your income. But if the asset you are chasing consistently grows faster than your pay, the finish line continues moving away from you.
Even households earning decent money are struggling.
A household earning Australia’s median income of approximately $118,000 could afford just 15% of homes sold in 2024–25, according to PropTrack.
Four years earlier, that same type of household could afford 43%.
For households around the 30th income percentile, only 3% of homes were considered affordable.
This is no longer a problem limited to people on very low incomes. A six-figure household income is no longer enough to access most of the Australian property market.
Renting was supposed to be the fallback
When homeownership became unrealistic, renting was presented as a lifestyle choice.
Young people were told they could enjoy flexibility, live closer to work and invest their money elsewhere.
But renting only works as an alternative when rents remain affordable and tenancies remain secure.
Across Australia, median advertised rents for houses and units increased by approximately 48% over the decade to March 2025.
There was no 48% increase in the quality of those homes.
There was no 48% increase in space.
There was no 48% increase in tenant security.
The same properties simply became far more expensive to occupy.
A generation that cannot afford to buy is now competing for a limited supply of rentals with other young workers, families, recent migrants and older Australians who also remain in the rental system for longer.
The result is not difficult to predict.
More applicants. Higher rents. Less negotiating power. Smaller homes. Longer commutes. Greater insecurity.
And every extra dollar paid to a landlord is one less dollar available for the deposit that might eventually allow a renter to escape.
That is the trap.
Rent because you cannot afford to buy. Then pay so much rent that you cannot save enough to buy.
Australia is creating two versions of Gen Z
The defining financial divide within Gen Z may not be salary, education or work ethic.
It may be whether their parents own property.
One young Australian can stay at home while saving a deposit, receive help from the Bank of Mum and Dad and use family equity to enter the market.
Another can earn the same salary but pay market rent, cover every living expense independently and attempt to save whatever remains.
These two people can work equally hard and make equally responsible decisions, yet experience completely different outcomes.
One enters the market and benefits when property prices rise.
The other watches those rising prices push ownership further away.
Housing is becoming less connected to what a young person earns and more connected to what their family already owns.
That is not simply an affordability problem. It is an inheritance system.
What “homeless” actually means
Calling Gen Z the first homeless generation sounds extreme.
But homelessness does not only mean sleeping on the street.
The Australian Bureau of Statistics also recognises people living in supported accommodation, temporarily staying with other households, living in boarding houses, occupying temporary lodgings or living in severely overcrowded dwellings.
In other words, a person can have somewhere to sleep tonight and still have no secure home.
That distinction matters.
More than 40,500 children and young people aged 12 to 24 who approached specialist homelessness services alone received assistance during 2024–25.
Around 21,700 were already experiencing homelessness.
Among clients aged 18 to 24, 69% needed accommodation-related assistance. Young people receiving support alone were also more likely to be couch surfing than any other specialist homelessness services client group.
These figures do not prove that all of Gen Z will become homeless.
They show what happens at the sharpest edge of a housing system that is already failing young people.
Those with family support stay home for longer.
Those with higher incomes enter increasingly expensive sharehouses.
Those with neither can fall into couch surfing, temporary accommodation, unsafe living arrangements or homelessness.
The outcomes are different, but the pressure comes from the same system.
Building more homes will take years
The obvious answer is to build more housing.
Australia’s National Housing Accord targets 1.2 million new homes over five years, beginning in July 2024.
By March 2026, approximately 308,000 homes had been completed. The National Housing Supply and Affordability Council now estimates the target will not be reached until the December quarter of 2030.
Construction is moving, but so is the population.
New homes also need to be built where people can access employment, education, transport and essential services. A house is not meaningfully affordable if living in it requires an exhausting commute and thousands of dollars in annual transport costs.
Supply matters, but supply that arrives late, costs too much or sits too far from opportunity will not solve the entire problem.
This is bigger than homeownership
The risk is not that every member of Gen Z ends up sleeping rough.
The risk is that secure housing becomes a privilege rather than a normal outcome of working life.
A generation of permanent renters will carry that insecurity into marriage, parenthood and eventually retirement.
They may delay having children because an additional bedroom costs too much. They may reject jobs in productive cities because rent absorbs too much of their income. They may reach retirement while still paying market rent, without the protection that outright homeownership has traditionally provided older Australians.
Australia’s housing system was built around the assumption that most people would eventually own their home.
If that assumption no longer applies, the consequences will extend far beyond property prices.
They will affect retirement policy, welfare spending, workforce mobility, family formation and inequality for decades.
Gen Z may not become Australia’s first entirely homeless generation.
But it could become the first generation for whom working full-time is no longer enough to guarantee secure housing.
And once both buying and renting become unaffordable, what exactly is the third option?
Use Australian Property Intelligence’s free tools to calculate the real cost of buying, borrowing and owning property before making your next move.
Related coverage
Melbourne listings rise as spring selling season begins
Melbourne enters spring with the deepest pool of stock of any capital city. Agents report vendors are pricing to meet the market rather than testing it, keeping clearance rates stable even as choice widens.
Sydney clearance rates hold above 65 per cent for a tenth week
Sydney's clearance rate of 67.4 per cent is the highest of the capitals and has now held above 65 per cent since mid-June.
Adelaide listings remain at record lows
Adelaide continues to record the lowest advertised stock per capita of any mainland capital.
Brisbane house prices continue to outperform southern capitals
Interstate migration has slowed from its 2023 peak but remains net positive, and Brisbane's rental vacancy rate of 1.0 per cent continues to push renters into ownership earlier than in the southern capitals.